My previous post on Google Ads and Penalization led me to this one. This post contains a question I hope to get some feedback on regarding Penalization of using Web Services.
How does a developer utilizing web services, specifically a Mashup developer, avoid getting penalized for duplicate content? Is this a real issue?
If severe penalization for duplicate content exists, this may effect those utilizing web services / APIs as data sources to create mashup sites. Especially using ecommerce web services and affiliate datafeeds, developers are contractually bound to use some exact content. The data provider is licensing the developer to utilize their content, however, my theory is that Google may see this as duplicate content. An example is an Amazon Associate using Amazon’s E-Commerce services to serve product, pricing, and review information.
This post from Search Engine Journal from Joe Duchesne back in July of 2005 reveals some interesting details:
“[…] Google is concerned about revolves around affiliate programs. It has been common practice for high traffic websites to establish an affiliate program. Affiliate programs themselves don’t worry Google. What it doesn’t like though, is for an affiliate program to take a template and then offer it to its base of affiliates to use. Some of the higher traffic websites end up with thousands upon thousands of duplicate websites all promoting the very same things and, according to Google, not offering any real value to the internet community. A website offering this type of cookie cutter website can easily find themselves de-listed by Google as happened to Template Monster a while back. […]”
So we know straightout affiliate, “cookie-cutter” type sites will suffer in Google. But my question is should this type of content be penalized, even if there is some original content in the mix? And is it already being penalized?
Another SEJ post, by Christoph Puetz, sheds some light into this area for us:
“On pages where duplicate content is being used, unique content should be added. I do not mean like just a few different words or a link/navigation menu. If you (the webmaster) can add 15% - 30% unique content to pages where you display duplicate content the overall ratio of duplicate content compared to the overall content of that page goes down. This will reduce the risk of having a page flagged as duplicate content.”
Ok, so add unique content. That might be a bit tricky for our site SecretPrices.com which consist of over a million dynamically generated pages! But we are definitely looking into ways to add unique content on portions of the site.
Christoph then goes on to say:
“Will this guarantee that your website stays in Google’s index? I don’t know.”
Great… So basically we’re back at square one!
Matt Cutts recently had a blog post about Notifying Webmasters of Penalties. I posted a comment, so I’ll see if he gets back to me on it. Eithier way the post is pretty informative, so I would suggest checking it out.
Personally, I’m not going to count on any great amount of organic Google traffic for any sites created based strongly on web services.
Here are some related readings: