<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shopping.com Introduces Shop Widgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/</link>
	<description>Shopping APIs and Evolving E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourabh Niyogi</title>
		<link>http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourabh Niyogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-comparison/shoppingcom/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Has anyone gotten a response from Adsense on whether putting in sw.keyword parameters *based on the page content* is a violation of Adsense policy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone gotten a response from Adsense on whether putting in sw.keyword parameters *based on the page content* is a violation of Adsense policy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-comparison/shoppingcom/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Audited versus unaudited CPC was virtually the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audited versus unaudited CPC was virtually the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Mezzacca</title>
		<link>http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Mezzacca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-comparison/shoppingcom/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Did you notice the higher CPC on both Unaudited and Audited revenues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice the higher CPC on both Unaudited and Audited revenues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-comparison/shoppingcom/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>In fact, I setup a shopping.com API account precisely for that reason.... to bypass Chitika. I figured for the short time it would take for me to interface with the API I could be receiving more money ($1.00 for example rather than $0.54). But that didn&#039;t happen.

I wonder if anybody else who has used both Chitika and the Shopping.com API directly has experienced the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I setup a shopping.com API account precisely for that reason&#8230;. to bypass Chitika. I figured for the short time it would take for me to interface with the API I could be receiving more money ($1.00 for example rather than $0.54). But that didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>I wonder if anybody else who has used both Chitika and the Shopping.com API directly has experienced the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Mezzacca</title>
		<link>http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-com/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Mezzacca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextgenerationshopping.com/shopping-comparison/shoppingcom/2006/09/06/shoppingcom-introduces-shop-widgets/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Interesting point Bob.  It maybe that Chitika has a different arrangment (revenue share) with Shopping.com than you, because of the large volume of leads they produce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point Bob.  It maybe that Chitika has a different arrangment (revenue share) with Shopping.com than you, because of the large volume of leads they produce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

